StudyVault
Home Unit Overview Exam Technique Revision Techniques ← Previous Lesson Next Lesson →

← Back to Dashboard

Overlay:
0:00 / 0:00 Narration generated using AI text-to-speech.

Presenting & Analysing Fieldwork Data

This lesson covers the general fieldwork skills, terminology, and exam-paper expectations that apply to every student. The specific sites, data, and methods your class actually used will be different — for the case study you’ll write about in the exam, refer to your teacher’s notes and the data you collected on the day.

Why Presentation Matters

Raw fieldwork data is just numbers and notes. To answer a geographical question you need to present it in a form that lets you see patterns — and the form has to fit the data. Choosing the wrong graph or map throws marks away. The exam often shows you data in a table or graph and asks you to describe a trend, calculate a statistic, or pick a better way of presenting it. The same logic applies to your own investigation: every piece of data you collected should appear in your write-up in the form most suited to its type.

Key Fact

Match the graph to the data: line graphs for continuous change, bar charts for categories, pie charts for percentages of a total, scatter graphs for paired variables, and flow lines or choropleth maps for spatial data.

Common Graph Choices

A line graph shows continuous change — river velocity at sites 1–5 along a course, or pedestrian count over the day. A bar chart compares categories — types of land use in a CBD, or visitor age groups in a National Park. A pie chart shows shares of a whole — the proportion of vacant vs occupied shops — but only when categories add to 100%. A scatter graph tests a relationship between two variables — pebble size against distance downstream. A compound (stacked) bar shows two layers at once, e.g. occupied vs vacant shops at five sites.

Maps for Spatial Data

Maps are essential when location matters. A choropleth map shades areas by value — perfect for population density across a city or footfall categories across village zones. A flow-line map uses thick arrows to show movement — ideal for showing pedestrian flows along high streets, or river discharge at survey points. Proportional symbols place a circle or square at each site, sized to match the value — for example, footfall counts at five village locations.

Edexcel asks you to be comfortable with both hand-drawn and computer-generated presentation. GIS tools like Esri ArcGIS Online or Digimap let you layer data onto base maps quickly, calculate buffer zones around features and analyse spatial patterns. Hand-drawn maps stay essential because the exam expects you to be able to interpret and complete maps and graphs by hand. Skills to show include adding a title, scale bar, north arrow, key, and accurate labelling. Marks are lost for missing units on a graph axis or no key on a choropleth.

Describing & Analysing Patterns

When the exam says ‘describe the pattern shown,’ you must do three things: state the overall trend, quote specific figures from the data, and identify any anomalies — sites or values that go against the pattern. A useful structure is TEA: Trend, Examples, Anomalies. So instead of writing ‘footfall increases from morning to lunchtime,’ write ‘footfall rose from 32/min at 9 a.m. to a peak of 78/min at 12:30, before falling to 41/min at 4 p.m.; site 4 was an anomaly with only 12/min, possibly because it lay on a back street.’

Statistical Tools

Edexcel expects you to be able to calculate basic statistics. The median is a useful average for skewed data such as pebble size, where one boulder can pull the mean. The interquartile range shows how spread out the data is. Percentage change = (new − old) ÷ old × 100; this often appears in change-over-time questions. Always show your working in the exam — calculations marks are easy to lose by missing units or not rounding clearly.

Conclusions That Answer the Question

A conclusion is not a description — it is a direct answer to the original enquiry question, supported by your own data and any wider geographical theory. The structure that scores well is: (1) restate the question, (2) state your overall finding, (3) quote two pieces of evidence, (4) link to a relevant model or case study, (5) acknowledge the most important limitation. For example: ‘Our investigation asked whether the river fits the Bradshaw model. Site 5 had three times the discharge of site 1, and pebble roundness rose from 1.2 to 3.4. This broadly supports the model, although the steep, narrow channel at site 3 was an anomaly — perhaps because of a recently engineered weir.’

Stage 6 of the enquiry process is reflection: critically reviewing methods, data and conclusions. There is a clear difference between describing (what happened) and evaluating (whether it was reliable). A strong evaluation names a specific weakness (small sample, weather on the day, observer bias) and explains how it affected the result, then suggests a realistic improvement. Vague comments such as ‘the data was not very reliable’ are worth little without a reason and a fix.

Key Fact

For describing data, use TEA: Trend, Examples (two figures), Anomalies. For conclusions, restate the question, give your finding, support with two pieces of evidence and end with one acknowledged limitation.

Practice Questions

Test yourself on this lesson. Pick a question, write your answer, then get it marked.

AI feedback
AI feedback is guidance, not a final exam mark. If you disagree, your teacher's view is always the tie-breaker.
← Back to unit
Video

© 2026 StudyVault · About · FAQ · Copyright & IP · Privacy · Disclaimers

StudyVault Education Ltd · registered in England and Wales, company no. 17490559 · 71–75 Shelton Street, London WC2H 9JQ