Little Bighorn, Wounded Knee and the End of the Frontier
From Treaties to Small Reservations
By the late 1860s the United States had abandoned the older policy of a Permanent Indian Frontier and shifted to a system of small reservations. The 1867 Medicine Lodge Treaty placed the southern Plains nations — Comanche, Kiowa, Cheyenne and Arapaho — on reservations in present-day Oklahoma. The 1868 Fort Laramie Treaty placed the northern Plains Lakota on the Great Sioux Reservation in Dakota Territory, with the sacred Black Hills inside it. The treaties promised annuity goods (tools, food, blankets) and set the Black Hills aside for the Lakota’s ‘absolute and undisturbed use and occupation’.
Around the new reservations, federal policy attacked the buffalo herds on which Plains life depended. Railroad sport-hunters, hide hunters supplying Eastern leather factories, and the deliberate encouragement of military commanders like General Sheridan combined to reduce the buffalo from an estimated 30 million in 1860 to fewer than a thousand by 1885. Buffalo destruction was a Plains nations’ subsistence collapse and a federal weapon in the same act.
The 1867 Medicine Lodge Treaty placed southern Plains nations on Oklahoma reservations; the 1868 Fort Laramie Treaty placed the Lakota on the Great Sioux Reservation, including the sacred Black Hills. Together they replaced earlier treaty territories with a system of fixed, smaller reservations.
Black Hills Gold and the Great Sioux War
In 1874 a US Army expedition led by Lieutenant Colonel George Custer confirmed gold in the Black Hills. Within a year miners poured in, breaking the 1868 Fort Laramie Treaty. When the federal government failed to remove them and offered to buy the Black Hills, the Lakota leaders — Sitting Bull and Crazy Horse foremost among them — refused. The army responded by ordering all Lakota onto the reservation by January 1876 or be treated as hostile. Most refused. The result was the Great Sioux War of 1876-77.
The Battle of the Little Bighorn, June 1876
On 25 June 1876, Lieutenant Colonel Custer’s Seventh Cavalry attacked a vast Lakota and Cheyenne encampment along the Little Bighorn River in Montana. Custer underestimated the camp’s size and split his command. Crazy Horse led the counter-charge; 268 men of the Seventh Cavalry were killed, Custer among them. The Battle of the Little Bighorn was the most spectacular Native victory of the Plains wars. It was also their last. The shock to American opinion drove Congress to pour troops into the region; within a year Crazy Horse had surrendered and was killed in custody, and Sitting Bull had taken his people into Canada (returning in 1881).
With the Plains nations militarily contained, federal policy shifted to forced cultural assimilation. The Dawes Act of 1887, named after Senator Henry Dawes, broke up tribal reservations into 160-acre family allotments — the same quarter sections homesteaders had been claiming since 1862. ‘Surplus’ reservation land was opened to white settlement. Citizenship was offered to those who accepted allotments and adopted ‘civilised’ ways. Children were taken from families and sent to off-reservation boarding schools where Indigenous languages were forbidden. Between 1887 and 1934 the Dawes system reduced tribal landholding from around 138 million acres to 48 million — a loss of two-thirds.
The Ghost Dance and Wounded Knee
In 1889 a Paiute prophet, Wovoka, had a vision: if Indigenous peoples lived peacefully and performed a ritual Ghost Dance, the dead would return, the buffalo would come back and white settlers would vanish. The movement spread quickly to the Lakota in 1890. Reservation agents, alarmed, called for troops. Sitting Bull was killed by reservation police on 15 December 1890. Two weeks later, on 29 December 1890, the Seventh Cavalry intercepted a band of Miniconjou Lakota under Spotted Elk at Wounded Knee Creek in South Dakota. As soldiers tried to disarm the band, a shot was fired; the cavalry opened up with rifles and Hotchkiss cannon. At least 250 Lakota men, women and children were killed. Twenty-five US soldiers died, many from their own crossfire.
The Frontier ‘Closes’
The 1890 US Census report contained a single sentence with vast cultural reach: it declared that there was no longer a continuous frontier line of unsettled territory. Three years later, the historian Frederick Jackson Turner read his Frontier Thesis at the World’s Columbian Exposition in Chicago. Turner argued that the experience of conquering the frontier had created American democracy itself; with the frontier closed, a defining era of American history was over. Turner’s thesis dominated Western history for most of the 20th century.
From the 1980s onwards, revisionist historians like Patricia Nelson Limerick and Richard White rejected Turner’s triumphalism. Limerick’s Legacy of Conquest (1987) reframed the West as a story of conquest, race and unfinished business rather than progress. White’s work foregrounded Native agency — treating the Plains nations as active negotiators and adapters, not passive victims. The two views are not symmetrical: most modern historians broadly accept the revisionist case while debating its emphasis. The specification does not require students to name these historians, but the IDEAS — conquest vs progress, agency vs victimhood — are valuable for top-band interpretation answers.
The closing of the frontier rests on four milestones in close sequence: the 1887 Dawes Act, the December 1890 Wounded Knee Massacre, the 1890 Census declaration that the frontier no longer existed, and Frederick Jackson Turner’s 1893 Frontier Thesis. Whether the closing was a national achievement, a tragedy or both is the central historical debate.