The Dhamma and the Three Marks of Existence
What Is the Dhamma?
The word Dhamma (Sanskrit: Dharma) is one of the most important concepts in Buddhism. It refers both to the way things truly are — the underlying nature of reality — and to the body of teachings the Buddha gave to help people understand and live in accordance with that reality. When Buddhists talk about “taking refuge in the Dhamma,” they mean committing themselves to the Buddhist path and the truths the Buddha discovered at his Enlightenment.
The Dhamma is one of the Three Jewels (also called the Three Refuges) alongside the Buddha and the Sangha (community). Buddhists in Britain today, whether practising in a Theravada vihara in London or a Tibetan centre in Cumbria, chant “I take refuge in the Dhamma” as a central act of commitment to their faith.
Dependent Arising
Dependent arising (Pali: paticcasamupada) is a foundational insight at the heart of the Dhamma. It teaches that nothing in the universe exists independently or by its own fixed nature — every phenomenon arises because other conditions give rise to it, and when those conditions change or cease, the phenomenon changes or ceases too. This applies to physical objects, mental states, relationships, even the sense of “self” we experience.
The teaching is sometimes summarised as: “When this arises, that arises. When this ceases, that ceases.” For example, suffering arises because of craving; when craving is removed, suffering is removed. Understanding dependent arising is considered essential to liberation in Buddhism because it dismantles the illusion that things — including “me” — are solid, permanent and separate from everything else.
The Three Marks of Existence are anicca (impermanence), anatta (no fixed self) and dukkha (unsatisfactoriness/suffering). The Buddha taught that all conditioned phenomena share these three characteristics. Recognising them is the beginning of the path to liberation.
Anicca — Impermanence
Anicca is the Pali word for impermanence. The Buddha taught that everything that arises through causes and conditions — every thought, feeling, physical object, relationship and mental state — is in constant flux and will eventually cease. Even what feels most solid and reliable is subject to change.
For Buddhists, recognising anicca is not meant to lead to despair but to wisdom. When a practitioner understands impermanence deeply — not just intellectually but through meditation — they stop clinging so tightly to experiences, people or possessions, knowing that holding on to what must eventually change is itself a cause of suffering. Many Buddhist teachers point to the changing of the seasons, the ageing of the body, or the passing of emotions as everyday reminders of anicca.
Anatta — No Fixed Self
Anatta is often translated as “no-self,” but this requires careful explanation. The Buddha did not simply deny that experience exists — he denied that there is a fixed, permanent, independent “self” standing behind our experiences. What we call “I” or “me” is, in the Theravada analysis, a constantly changing flow of the Five Aggregates (skandhas) — form, sensation, perception, mental formations and consciousness. None of these aggregates, individually or together, constitutes a permanent, unchanging self.
A common error is to translate anatta as “there is no soul” and stop there. The Buddhist teaching is more precise: the claim is that there is no fixed, permanent, unchanging self — not that experience or personality ceases to exist. The personality is better understood as the Five Aggregates in flux, with no solid “core” at the centre. Theravada Buddhism emphasises the analytical approach to anatta (dissecting experience into the Five Aggregates); Mahayana Buddhism develops the related concept of sunyata (emptiness), which extends the no-fixed-self insight to all phenomena, not just persons. Naming the sub-tradition and using the correct Pali or Sanskrit terms makes an answer more precise.
Dukkha — Unsatisfactoriness and Suffering
Dukkha is the third mark. It is often translated as “suffering,” but the Pali term carries a richer meaning: it includes obvious suffering (pain, illness, grief), the suffering of change (pleasures that cannot last), and the pervasive unsatisfactoriness of conditioned existence as a whole — the background sense that nothing quite delivers the lasting fulfilment we seek.
The Buddha identified three types of dukkha. The first is ordinary pain and distress (dukkha-dukkha) — physical and emotional suffering. The second is the suffering of change (viparinama-dukkha) — the way pleasant experiences are impermanent and turn into loss. The third is the suffering of conditioned existence itself (sankhara-dukkha) — the underlying restlessness of a life not yet liberated. Understanding dukkha motivates Buddhists to seek the path that leads beyond it.
The Three Marks of Existence are not separate ideas — they are all expressions of dependent arising. Because everything arises in dependence on causes (dependent arising), everything is impermanent (anicca). Because everything is impermanent, there is no fixed self to hold onto (anatta). Because we keep trying to find lasting satisfaction in impermanent things and a non-existent fixed self, we experience unsatisfactoriness (dukkha). Grasping this chain of reasoning is central to the Dhamma. Priya, a lay Buddhist who attends the London Buddhist Centre, described it to her study group like this: “Understanding the Three Marks didn’t make life feel worse — it made me stop fighting against the grain of reality.”
Dependent arising (paticcasamupada) underpins all three marks: because things arise dependently, they are impermanent (anicca); because they are impermanent, there is no fixed self (anatta); and because we cling to what cannot last, there is suffering (dukkha). This interconnected understanding is the foundation of the Dhamma.