Divorce: Causes, Consequences and Theoretical Perspectives
Divorce in Britain Since 1945
Divorce is the legal ending of a marriage. The pattern of divorce in Britain since 1945 is one of dramatic and sustained increase, followed by a plateau and some decline in more recent years. In the decade after the Second World War, divorce was relatively rare — around 25,000 divorces per year in England and Wales. By the mid-1990s this had risen to more than 150,000 per year, the highest levels ever recorded in England and Wales. Since then the rate has declined somewhat, partly because marriage itself has become less common: more couples cohabit rather than marry, and fewer marriages can therefore end in divorce. Understanding the causes and consequences of this change is a central requirement of the families topic.
Legal Changes: The Divorce Reform Act 1969 and the 2022 No-Fault Reform
One of the most significant causes of the rising divorce rate was legal change. The Divorce Reform Act 1969, which came into force in 1971, fundamentally changed the legal basis of divorce in England and Wales. Before 1969, divorce required proof of a matrimonial “offence” such as adultery or cruelty. The 1969 Act replaced this with a single ground: irretrievable breakdown of marriage. This made divorce substantially easier and cheaper to obtain, and the divorce rate almost doubled in the years immediately after the Act came into force.
A further significant reform occurred in 2022 in England and Wales. The Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Act 2020 (which came into force in April 2022) introduced no-fault divorce. Previously, even under the 1969 Act, one partner usually had to cite fault (such as adultery or unreasonable behaviour) to obtain a prompt divorce. The 2022 reform removed the need to attribute blame, making the process less adversarial. Sociologists note this reform may reduce the financial and psychological costs of divorce and could contribute to further changes in divorce statistics in the coming years.
Changing Social Attitudes and Secularisation
Legal change does not occur in a social vacuum. The 1969 Act reflected — and further accelerated — a broader shift in social attitudes towards divorce. As Britain became an increasingly secularised society, the religious stigma attached to divorce diminished. The Church of England and the Roman Catholic Church had traditionally taught that marriage was a lifelong sacrament and that divorce was morally wrong. As church attendance fell across the twentieth century and religious authority over personal life weakened, divorce became more socially acceptable. By the end of the twentieth century, divorce carried little social stigma in most communities.
More broadly, changing social values contributed to higher divorce rates. The growing expectation that marriage should provide personal fulfilment, romantic love and emotional intimacy — rather than simply economic partnership or social respectability — raised the bar for what constituted a “good enough” marriage. When marriages fell below this standard, individuals became more likely to seek divorce rather than continue in an unhappy relationship.
Four main reasons explain the rise in divorce since 1945: (1) legal change — the Divorce Reform Act 1969 introduced irretrievable breakdown as grounds for divorce; (2) the 2022 no-fault divorce reform reduced adversarial blame; (3) secularisation — declining religious stigma against divorce; (4) changing social attitudes and the changing status of women.
The Changing Status of Women
A particularly important cause of rising divorce rates is the changing status of women in society. Women’s increasing participation in paid employment since the Second World War gave many women greater economic independence. This reduced the financial dependence on a male partner that had previously made divorce an unviable option for many women. Research consistently shows that the majority of divorce petitions in England and Wales are filed by women — suggesting that women are more likely to seek to end unsatisfactory marriages when they have the economic means to do so.
The changing status of women is also linked to changing expectations: women’s greater social and political equality has raised their expectations of what a marriage should provide. The continued unequal distribution of domestic labour — Oakley’s double shift — means that many women experience marriage as disproportionately burdensome, and rising aspirations make this burden less acceptable over time.
Consequences of Divorce for Family Members
The consequences of divorce affect all members of the family. For partners, divorce can bring relief from an unhappy relationship but also significant emotional, financial and practical difficulties. Women tend to experience greater financial hardship after divorce, since they are more likely to have reduced their participation in paid employment during the marriage. Men tend to experience greater social isolation after divorce, since they are less likely to have primary care of children and may have weaker social networks outside the family.
For children, sociological research presents a complex picture. Some research suggests that parental conflict — not divorce itself — is the key factor in children’s outcomes. Divorce may in some cases be better for children than continuing in a highly conflicted marriage. Other research highlights the economic and social disadvantages associated with growing up in a lone parent household, including lower educational achievement and poorer health outcomes. Sociologists caution against treating all divorces as equally harmful, since outcomes vary significantly with income, quality of post-divorce parenting arrangements and the degree of continued conflict between former partners.
For the extended family, divorce disrupts grandparent–grandchild relationships and wider kinship networks. Grandparents on the non-resident parent’s side may lose contact with grandchildren entirely. The rise of divorce has also contributed significantly to the growth of lone parent families in the UK, since many divorces involve dependent children.
Serial monogamy describes the practice of having a succession of monogamous relationships or marriages — one at a time. As divorce has become more socially acceptable, more people go on to form new partnerships and remarry after divorce. Some functionalists interpret this as evidence that marriage as an institution remains highly valued: people seek it again after it breaks down rather than abandoning the institution entirely. Sociologists describe the growing prevalence of serial monogamy as reflecting the individualisation of relationship choice in contemporary society.
An empty shell marriage, by contrast, is a marriage that persists legally but in which the couple have effectively separated emotionally. Empty shell marriages may persist for financial reasons (such as maintaining a joint mortgage), social reasons (religious objection to divorce) or for the perceived benefit of children. This concept is important because it shows that official divorce statistics undercount the real number of relationships that have broken down.
Functionalist view: Parsons argued that the family adapts to meet social needs. Rising divorce rates may reflect rising expectations of what marriage should provide rather than signalling a crisis of the family. High remarriage rates support this: marriage as an institution remains valued, even if individual marriages fail.
Feminist view: Most divorce petitions are filed by women, supporting the feminist argument that marriage has historically placed greater burdens on women. Rising divorce rates reflect women’s growing economic independence and their capacity to leave unsatisfactory relationships. From this perspective, rising divorce is not a symptom of social breakdown but of women’s liberation from patriarchal constraints.
Marxist view: Marxists argue the causes of marital breakdown are often rooted in the economic conditions of capitalism — poverty, financial stress, the alienation of work and housing insecurity all increase pressure on family relationships. Zaretsky would see rising divorce as partly a consequence of the pressures capitalism places on workers and their families.
New Right view: Murray’s New Right perspective is critical of rising divorce rates, arguing that the growth of lone parent families resulting from divorce contributes to a dependency culture and the development of an underclass. Children raised without two parents are argued by the New Right to be educationally and socially disadvantaged. This view is challenged by feminist sociologists, who argue it pathologises lone parent families without addressing the structural causes of their difficulties.
The main consequences of divorce include: financial hardship (particularly for women); social isolation (particularly for men); varied impacts on children’s wellbeing; disruption of extended family relationships; and a significant increase in lone parent families. Serial monogamy and empty shell marriages show the complex reality behind divorce statistics.